Still working to recover. Please don't edit quite yet.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:X"
From Anarchopedia
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry, I referred to this link mainly as an example of what Anarchopedia should ''not'' be. I wrote something like, "And please, remember, no dogma's. For those you can go to Conservapedia ;-)". But if you think that's promotion, well... Anyway, I'm not particularly attached to this link, so we might as well leave it out. In fact, I just removed it. [[Gebruiker:Paul|Paul]] 28 mrt 2007 12:23 (UTC) | Sorry, I referred to this link mainly as an example of what Anarchopedia should ''not'' be. I wrote something like, "And please, remember, no dogma's. For those you can go to Conservapedia ;-)". But if you think that's promotion, well... Anyway, I'm not particularly attached to this link, so we might as well leave it out. In fact, I just removed it. [[Gebruiker:Paul|Paul]] 28 mrt 2007 12:23 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Thanks. We had a strong fight in german Anarchopedia, about Individualism and Anarcho-Capitalism. I enjoy that we are an international community with same thinking. This helps in this fight... If you like i tell more about our problems later... --[[Gebruiker:X|X]] 1 apr 2007 05:09 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:09, 1 April 2007
Sorry, I referred to this link mainly as an example of what Anarchopedia should not be. I wrote something like, "And please, remember, no dogma's. For those you can go to Conservapedia ;-)". But if you think that's promotion, well... Anyway, I'm not particularly attached to this link, so we might as well leave it out. In fact, I just removed it. Paul 28 mrt 2007 12:23 (UTC)
- Thanks. We had a strong fight in german Anarchopedia, about Individualism and Anarcho-Capitalism. I enjoy that we are an international community with same thinking. This helps in this fight... If you like i tell more about our problems later... --X 1 apr 2007 05:09 (UTC)